Posts by Rob Costello, Dairy Technical/Business Support Manager, Milk Specialties Global

Translate Blog Content

Thursday, June 6, 2013

The Science Of Mixing Milk Replacer - Mixology 101



What could be easier than mixing a bit of powder in water, right? If it were only that simple...

When it comes to mixing and feeding milk replacer to calves, or any baby animal for that matter, there are a surprising number of issues that can creep up, either from a mixing, feeding or an animal performance standpoint. How we measure milk replacer powder, how we mix it with water and the temperature at both mixing and feeding time affect the calf as well as the milk replacer.

Measuring
Scoop. A complementary measuring scoop is usually provided in each bag of milk replacer -- considered by many calf raisers to be an inconvenience that has to be fished out and thrown away. When used according to label instructions, the scoop can approximate the weight of the desired amount of powder. Basically, we're using a volume estimate to approximate (or estimate) a weight measurement.

If you choose to use the scoop for this purpose, keep in mind that product density (how much actually fits in a scoop) varies from product to product and even within a product over time. So it's a good idea to check the actually weight with a scale, and mark a line on the cup for the desired weight. Some scoops are pre-marked, but you still need to check the accuracy. Be consistent with how you scoop, and since manufacturers use different scoops, be sure to use the scoop that came with the product.

Weigh scale. This is the best way to go. No doubt about it. Using a weighing device to measure weight eliminates the guesswork involved in using a scoop and assures consistency and accuracy. It minimizes variability from calf to calf, from batch to batch and from day to day.

Variability is an even bigger challenge when more than one person is doing the measuring and mixing. Weighing milk replacer instead of relying on a scoop goes a long way toward keeping things consistent and running smoothly.

Kitchen/Household measuring cup. Although rarely an issue with seasoned calf raisers, I do come across folks from time to time who are using a standard measuring cup to measure milk replacer, usually with poor results. Perhaps there wasn't a scoop in the bag, or maybe they simply wanted to improve their feeding accuracy, but their animals aren't doing very well and they don't know why.

The problem stems from the ease with which we use a measuring cup to measure both dry and liquid ingredients. For example, 8 oz of water equals one cup, and a cup of water has the same volume measurement as a cup of rice, a cup of spinach or a cup of milk replacer powder -- but they all have different weights. By using the 8 oz mark on the measuring cup to measure milk replacer powder, you'll end up with about 1/2 the correct amount of powder.

A large plastic 2 or 4 cup capacity measuring cup is nice for scooping powder into a bucket for weighing, but to use it for measuring, you need to calibrate it first by weighing the powder and marking the scoop accordingly.
Mixing
Most milk replacers come with simple, easy instructions that tell you to add a certain amount of powder (usually 8 or 10 oz) to 2 quarts of warm water, mix, and then feed the mixture to the calf. That's OK if you're feeding the calf with a pail, but what if you want to fit that mixture into a 2 qt bottle or your're mixing for more than one calf?

You soon realize you have a problem. When you add milk replacer powder to water, the powder displaces some of the water, resulting in more liquid than the original volume of water. When adding 8 ounces of powder to 2 quarts of water, the final volume is about 70 ounces instead of the 64 ounces (2 quarts) you started with. This solution is very different from one where you mix powder and water so that the final volume (not the starting volume) is 2 quarts -- in this case you start with a quart or so of water, add powder, mix, then add more water until you reach a total volume of 2 quarts.

Solids. The concentration, or solids percentage of each of these solutions is markedly different. The first solution is more dilute and has about 10.7% solids, whereas the second solution has about 11.6% solids. Compare these to whole milk which is around 12% solids or higher. To assure that calves don't get short-changed nutritionally, use the second mixing option (water + powder + water) where you mix in the powder before you reach the final volume. For more information about calculating % solids, see the short discussion provided at the end of this post.

Mixing equipment. When mixing by hand, a wire whisk or whip should be used to help ensure complete mixing. Whisks are specifically designed for this function and are available in a variety of sizes. I recently came across a whisk that was 36 inches long.

Some farms add a little power to the mixing processes by using a hand-held variable speed drill with a paint mixer attached for mixing milk replacer. This can work OK, especially when mixing in 5 gallon buckets, but for the young and inexperienced, this type of unprotected technology has the potential for causing serious injuries.

Power mixers are a good choice when mixing larger batches of milk replacer. Mixers can be stationary or portable and the tubs are typically made of plastic or stainless steel. The stationary mixer pictured here has a slightly translucent plastic tub that lets you see the level of liquid from outside the tub. This one has been calibrated and marked so it's easy to tell just how much liquid you have. When mixing, gradually adding milk replacer powder to the mixer while it is running helps avoid lumps. Be sure to add all of the powder before you reach the final liquid volume.

Solubility. Simply put, solubility is the greatest amount of milk replacer powder that can be dissolved in a given amount of water at a specific temperature. Most milk replacer ingredients dissolve in water, but there are some ingredients and specialty additives that are less soluble and some that won't dissolve no matter how much you mix. Most of these are suspendable in solution, and some may eventually settle or rise over time. It is important to mix well to ensure that all ingredients are evenly dispersed throughout the liquid so that each calf receives the appropriate combination and level of nutrients.

Temperature
Mix Temperature is an important aspect of  mixing milk replacer. I have seen mixing temperature recommendations from a low of 105° F (41° C) to a high of over 170° F  (76° C). That's a mighty wide range, and reflects a number of objectives.

For many calf raisers, it's all about getting milk replacer powder into solution. A product that readily mixes in cool water may seem desirable, but it's actually a bit irrelevant. Use of special emulsifiers during manufacturing can help suspend fat in cool liquid, but warm water is needed to bring the fat into full contact with the liquid. The typical fats used in milk replacers usually melt between 100° and 115° F (38°- 46° C). Once melted, the fat becomes an integral part of the liquid emulsion, interacting with proteins which help emulsify and dissolve the fat in the solution. At minimum, the water temperature used for mixing should be high enough to get this done. Using a lower mix temperature often leads to reduced solubility and may adversely affect ingredient digestibility.

Mixing at even higher temperatures can also have some interesting effects. Proteins interact with fats at their surface -- the lipid/water interface -- binding with both the fat droplet and the surrounding water molecules. In this way proteins coat the fat droplet, providing a barrier that prevents individual droplets from joining together and separating from the solution. But as the mix temperature is increased, the effect on fat droplets is to break larger droplets into smaller ones. This increases the overall fat surface available for protein attachment which may improve overall solubility and even enhance digestibility of the fat.

However, the effect of higher mix temperatures on fat droplet size should not be considered a universal effect on all milk replacers. A manufacturing process that involves higher temperatures such as those attained during pasteurization or reduction of fat droplet size through homogenization, may not show further benefit on fat droplet size when the milk replacer powder is mixed in hotter water.

As a matter of fact, higher mix temperatures can actually cause proteins to migrate from the fat droplets allowing fat to separate and rise to the top of the solution, ultimately depositing on mixing and feeding equipment. On the other hand, proteins may remain attached to fat droplets, but aggregate together in high temperature conditions, causing clumping of protein/fat globules. In reality, these behaviors are not just due to changes in temperature. The types of proteins present, emulsifying agents, ion concentrations, pH, the presence of other ingredients and factors all come together with the mix temperature to affect the stability and effectiveness of the emulsion.


So there is no one way to do this. One size does not fit all. There are several different manufacturing processes for milk replacer, each with their own powder characteristics and mixing requirements. This may sound too easy, but follow the manufacturers instructions regarding the mix temperature for their milk replacer to minimize the chance of any mixing issues.

Feeding Temperature recommendations for milk replacer range from about 102° - 107° F (38.9° - 41.7° C) in the US. Higher feeding temperatures may be recommended in other regions. When feeding milk replacer, keep in mind that the normal body temperature of a healthy calf is just under 102° F . Feeding colder milk replacer requires the calf to expend energy warming the milk replacer to its body temperature after it has been consumed. Not only does this waste energy, colder temperature liquids may reduce the calf''s willingness to drink.

Feeding warm milk replacer can help stimulate closure of the esophageal groove, which prevents milk replacer from entering the rumen and potentially causing digestive disturbances. This temperature effect appears to be fairly strong, since feeding warm water alone has been shown to stimulate esophageal groove closure when fed to calves up to 16 weeks old*.

In order for milk replacer to arrive at the calf at the right temperature, both the mixing temperature and feeding procedures need to be considered. The final mix temperature may need to be adjusted during the mixing process to accommodate the cooling that occurs between mixing and feeding time. This is especially important during cold weather and may require modifications to the feeding procedure as well to prevent excessive cooling.

Thermometers/Temperature Gauges.  The only way to know the temperature is to measure it. Instant-read thermometers are very quick and inexpensive. You could use an in-line temperature gauge to determine your mix temperature, but a thermometer is still needed to measure the temperature of the final mix.

It's also very important to measure the temperature of the milk replacer at the time calves drink it. Use an instant-read thermometer periodically as milk replacer is being delivered to individual calves to assure it is being fed at the right temperature. It is especially important to stay on top of this as environmental temperatures change or there are changes to your mixing or delivery procedures..



Calculating Solids

Assumptions:
weight of one gallon of water: 8.33 lb
weight of one gallon of reconstituted milk replacer (same as whole milk): 8.6 lb

1. Add 1 lb powder to water to make a final mix volume of 1 gallon:
    (1 lb/8.6 lb) x 100 = 0.116 x 100 = 11.6% solids

2. Add 1 lb powder to 1 gallon of water:
    total liquid: (1 1b + 8.33 lb) = 9.33 lb 
    (1 lb/9.33 lb) x 100 = 0.107 x 100 = 10.7 % solids



* Abe, M, T. Iriki, K. Kondoh and H. Shibui. 1978. Effects of nipple or bucket feeding of milk-substitute on rumen by-pass and on rate of passage in calves. Br. J. Nutr. 41: 173

updated February 2, 2014

Friday, February 1, 2013

Fly Control Update



For many of us, fly season is right around the corner. So it's back to the routine of fly baits, traps, sprays and fly predators -- not to mention renewed efforts with calf bedding, mowing, feed management, sanitation and clean-up. Whew! The good news is that this year's fly season brings some changes in the availability of fly control products that will greatly improve their distribution -- of the products, that is, not the flies.

The first is that Central Life Sciences is introducing a ClarifFly® Add-Pack that can be added directly to milk or milk replacer right on the farm. ClariFly® Larvicide is a feed supplement that prevents adult house flies, stable flies, face flies, and horn flies from developing in and emerging from the manure of treated cattle. ClariFly® passes through the digestive system and into the manure where it disrupts the normal molting process of the fly larvae.

In the past, ClariFly® has been available as an additive for dry feeds, including calf starter feeds. So, a calf's fly protection was related to when it began eating dry feed and how much feed it consumed. Now you can begin building that protection as soon as the calf is drinking from a bottle or pail. The Add-Pack can be mixed with both medicated and non-medicated milk replacers as well as whole milk, and should be readily available in March.

Medicated Milk Replacer. The second bit of news is also about ClariFly®. As of April 20th of this year, milk replacer manufacturers will be able to sell and ship medicated milk replacers containing ClariFly®. This will greatly improve the availability of ClariFly® in milk replacers throughout the U.S.

You may be wondering why ClariFly® can only be added to medicated milk replacers during manufacturing. Well, the EPA classifies ClariFly® as a pesticide when used in non-medicated feeds, and doing so requires EPA approval. Currently no EPA approval has been obtained for manufacturing non-medicated milk replacers with ClariFly®. So, no ClariFly® in non-medicated milk replacers.

However, when ClariFly® is used in milk replacers containing an FDA approved drug (Deccox, Bovatec, Neo-Oxy/Neo-Terra) it is considered a feed additive, not a pesticide. This means the product is regulated according to FDA status of the drug. Therefore, ClariFly® can be added during manufacturing of medicated milk replacers.

The ClariFly® Add-Pack, on the other hand, can be added to non-medicated milk replacers on the farm -- as well as medicated milk replacers and whole milk. Central Life Sciences has obtained EPA approval for the Add-Pack.



Keep in mind that the amount of ClariFly® a calf consumes is related to its feed intake. For a young calf consuming only milk replacer, the amount of ClariFly® consumed at each feeding is enough to provide adequate protection. But as the animal grows, the level of ClariFly® provided in milk replacer is not enough for its increasing body size. You can avoid a lapse in protection by providing ClariFly® in the starter as well as the milk replacer. Calves will maintain adequate fly protection as they increase starter intake and increase body weight. The two methods of providing ClariFly® to young calves go hand-in-hand.

For more information on fly control, check out this earlier post  On the Fly - fly control for calves





Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Calf Feeding -- Environmental Temperature & Energy Needs, with downloadable energy calculator


Energy intake becomes a big concern during cold weather. As environmental temperatures change so does a calf's need for energy. The graph below shows how a calf's body heat production relates to temperature changes in its environment. If the energy for producing heat doesn't come from its diet, the calf burns its body tissue to try to stay warm, and a young calf has precious little body energy reserves.




In practical terms, a calf should consume about 1.0 to 1.3% more energy for each degree the environmental temperature drops below 50° F. Factors such as bedding, housing type, exposure to wind and sun can influence the actual effect of temperature change. Generally speaking, when the temperature falls to 30° F the calf needs about 25% more energy than at 50° F, and at 10° F, it needs 50% more energy. When it comes to actually feeding calves, most calf raisers simply switch to a winter feeding rate based on local conditions, rather than making lots of little adjustments.

When feeding whole milk/waste milk, your options to increase energy intake are limited. You can feed more milk by increasing the volume fed at each meal or add another feeding during the day. You can also work in a high energy fortifier or milk replacer, especially if milk supply is limited.

With milk replacer, you have a few more options. You can increasing the total volume of milk replacer fed each day or you can increase the amount of powder mixed into a given volume of water -- more than 1.5 pounds of powder per gallon takes you to 18% solids and above so be sure calves have access to water. Many calf raisers choose to add a high energy supplement to their milk replacer as temperatures drop, while others switch to a higher energy milk replacer formula during winter months.

Comparing the energy provided by different feeding options can be a time consuming process. The calculator shown below makes it an easy job to compare milk replacer feeding options. Simply plug in the protein and fat percentages of a milk replacer along with the feeding rate to get the total energy provided to each calf. The calculator also lets you account for the addition of a high energy fortifier to milk replacer.




Download a working copy of Milk Replacer Energy Comparison Calculator